African leaders are cowards, except Mugabe and Ghadaffi!

Posted By ~ Mr. Simeon Tonata Angombe

This view is sparked by the fact that ever since the Zimbabwe trouble began in the 21st Century up until now, African leaders from everywhere embrace and cheer the Zimbabwean statesman whenever he walks into a congress room, and it's evident when they all salute him with a standing ovation. My question is sparked by the fact that, these chicken leaders are still complying with the European set standards that they (or their predecessors) agreed to when they signed the ill-thought diplomatic transitional agreements at the so-called inceptions of independence.

African leaders are playing hypocritical with our very own conscious right Mr. Robert Mugabe, who has been, and still is, man enough to stand alone and declare European economic and social interest representation in Africa since 1850s up until now as out of African interests.
Not only are we supporting, but we feel that he sees the need to prepare the continent by restoring it and leaving it in our hands, the future African generation.

Europe needs us more than we need it, that is why the SWANU Party Youth League is urging African leaders to adopt a uniform Economic, Social and Political understanding that will be strong enough to block and have an impact on the world market and force it (inevitably directly or indirectly) to conform to African standards of operations. Zimbabwe standing alone cannot do anything if the rest of Africa does not practically support the move.

On top of everything, I am not saying that Mr. Mugabe did the right thing by being undemocratic through oppressing his people and ruling undemocratically against the rule of law and human rights, but what I'm saying is that: For African leaders to adopt a democratic, socialistic and social justifiable approach/reaction based on the very nationalistic principles and goals that led Africans to develop the understanding of the need to liberate ourselves from the political colonial administrations from the 1950s onwards. Until we have this proposal in place, Africa remains a Western economic colony.

The SWANU Party Youth League believes that, Africa can be united like the USA and the EU, but only if we take the risk of a democratic socialistic approach that will face much criticism from the west off course, but that which allows room for economic emancipation and personal freedom, if only African leaders are to adopt the same (uniform) Economic and Social objectives for the real African Independence to take shape.

We strongly believe that one day we are going to have the United Nations of Africa, and not the United “States” of Africa, but only until when we let go of our political fears can we then have the UNA. Africa does not necessarily have to adopt the same political objectives in leadership, but that would obviously come into place when we realise how effective the SWANU Party Youth League's proposal is, and I know that Muarmmar Ghadaffi as well as Mr. Bob agrees with this view. The European Union is of the same Economic and Social objectives but does not share the presidency of EU because it is yet an issue to be resolved, so why can't Africa do it? How different are we from Europeans and the Americas?

We must let go of our political power fears and come together as a block continent for the common goals of emancipating our people and improving our living standards.

Besides being different ethnically, we are one and the same people who share the same interests, Economically, Socially and Politically. Thank you!